Check out agile admin James Wickett’s talk from DeliveryConf last month on adding security into your continuous software delivery pipeline!
Check out agile admin James Wickett’s talk from DeliveryConf last month on adding security into your continuous software delivery pipeline!
DevOpsDays Austin sponsored this great charity this year with our proceeds, and the program is so cool I wanted to do a whole post on it.
Community First! Village “is a 51-acre master planned community that provides affordable, permanent housing and a supportive community for men and women coming out of chronic homelessness.” It consists of 200+ micro-homes and RVs and supporting infrastructure, they’re at 78% of capacity already, and they are planning for another 300 homes to be built. They’re located in southeast Austin out near the Travis County Expo Center.
And it’s really nice! The primary kind of residence are little mini-houses, 180-200 square feet in size, with electricity but no plumbing. There are standalone bathroom buildings with individual lockable rooms. There’s kitchen buildings for more extensive cooking. There’s RVs, more expensive but better for those with medical problems. There’s a community garden (with chickens and bees), a store, a hairdresser, a garage, a forge, and more. Heck, there’s a bus stop and an Amazon dropbox.
Here’s a series of pictures I took on our tour.
Austin has around 2200 homeless, and the number continues to rise. My parents visited me in Austin a couple months ago, and we went out and ate and they were shocked by how many were on the street, especially as we drove through the “shelter district” downtown. There are many efforts to help, but this is an approach I hadn’t heard of before, and wanted to share with everyone.
Donna Emery, the Director of Development for Mobile Loaves & Fishes, gave us a tour and told us all about it. She’d love any of you to come tour the village as well! Mobile Loaves & Fishes as an organization has been serving the homeless for many years, and this is their deeply considered idea at making a permanent difference.
The village isn’t a shelter; it’s intended to be permanent. They identify candidates for the village via social workers and the array of people trying to help the increasing homeless population (there’s a database they all use to track homeless clients and try to get them services and such). The person says they want to get into the Village, and there’s an about 12 month runway program to get them ready and in.
There are three rules to living in the village.
Last year, residents earned $650k in “dignified income” – working in the gardens, crafting, doing maintenance, working in the garage and market… You can make $900/mo from a job cleaning the community bathrooms, for example. Donna stressed that they don’t rely on handouts – it harms the dignity of the people and you don’t take care of things that are free. When a major tech company donated a bunch of tablets, they set up a monthly tablet rental. “But those are free, we’re giving them to you, don’t make money off them,” they initially complained. But MLF explained that handouts are an unhealthy dynamic, and this way the renters respect the tablets – and themselves – more. They’ve put a lot of thought and experience into creating a place where communities and lives can grow for people that have had nothing.
Of course, they provide a lot of help, from social services to things like teaching them to use Netspend for money management.
Blue ribbon Austin business and organizations have donated a lot of the infrastructure to make this work – Alamo Drafthouse, HEB, Charles Maund, the Topfer family, and many more.
But the thing I found the most striking about this is that it’s really a community, and a part of the larger community around it.
40% of the residents are women. There have been two weddings so far among the residents and two residents passed away with their wishes to be interred in the Village. The average age of homeless coming there is around 50 and they’ve been chronically homeless for around 10 years. This isn’t an attempt at “give them a shower and shave and get them a job and send them back out into the wild,” this is a permanent home where they can belong as long as they want. Donna shared with us that what really makes persistent homelessness is some kind of crisis combined with a collapse of a person’s social relationships – no family, no friends to help. Being sent away from a community doesn’t tend to form better social support, does it?
From their FAQ:
It’s all about relationships. Mobile Loaves & Fishes desires to empower the community around us into a lifestyle of service with the homeless. We achieve this vision through Community First! Village by taking a relational approach for connecting with our homeless brothers and sisters, instead of a transactional approach. When we bring an individual into community with others, we truly begin to make a sustainable impact on their lives.
Mobile Loaves & Fishes believes that the single greatest cause of homelessness is a profound, catastrophic loss of family. That’s why our focus at Community First! Village is to do more than just provide adequate housing. We have developed a community with supportive services and amenities to help address an individual’s relational needs at a fraction of the cost of traditional housing initiatives. We seek to empower our residents to build relationships with others, and to experience healing and restoration as part of engaging with a broader community.
The businesses aren’t just for the residents – you can go there to the garage and pay to get your oil changed. You can go attend their movie nights (the Alamo donated a projector) that are open to the public like any movie night in any park. They do things like a trail of lights during the holidays. There’s plenty of reasons for non-residents to go there, it’s not a “camp.” It’s just a subdivision, really, like any other one you’d drive through in Austin.
Heck, you can go live there. 170 of the occupants are former homeless, but there are also many “mission families” living there with them to provide help and more strongly tie them into the social fabric of the Austin community. Or you can rent spare homes on AirBNB! They have a hall (“Unity Hall”) that can accommodate up to 300 and there’s a commercial kitchen attached (also staffed by residents) so you can host events there – we started seriously looking at it for smaller tech events. (More pics are in the slideshow above).
Let’s get real. If you’re reading this tech blog you’re probably incredibly well off. Working for a company that’s incredibly well off. We have an embarrassment of riches in the tech scene here in Austin, living next to people with nothing. In DevOps we talk continually about collaboration, sharing, and community – one would think that our appetite for helping the less fortunate would go farther than just making sure you get an underrepresented person on your next tech panel.
You can help with funding. Their Phase II capital campaign is building more homes and supporting buildings, a clinic, and more. Eventually they want things like dental care (an especially hard problem; it’s relatively expensive but dental problems unheeded turn into medical problems quickly). You can give, you can encourage your company to give. DevOpsDays Austin made spare money from sponsors, so we were able to put $25,000 into sponsoring one of the homes in their next phase.
You can help by volunteering. Persons or groups can email them and get set up to come help! Get your church or other organization involved. They’ve had over 100 Eagle Scouts do their projects out there.
You can help by participating in your local government. They had a long battle to be able to start the village and had to locate outside the City of Austin because of the never-ending NIMBY-ism of residents not wanting “those people” anywhere near them. Advocate for compassion and the homeless in your city council and other venues.
You can help even by just going there, using the businesses, interacting with the residents to weave them into the fabric of Austin. Go on a tour to see what they’re doing out there. Bring your kids! We all had a great and deeply moving family outing in our visit to the Village.
As mentioned, DevOpsDays Austin 2019 went off great! And after the event, we sent out extensive surveys to attendees, sponsors, volunteers, speakers, and even the organizers to learn and improve. (Thanks to everyone who gave their feedback, we appreciate it!)
Last year we also did an extensive retrospective to figure out how we wanted this year to go, and this year’s event was driven by that feedback and our vision to make DoD Austin the place for practitioners to come, learn from each other, and build the local community.
Let me share this year’s retro with you – some of the numbers and sentiments are below with my thoughts. If you want the full details, sure, here you go!
If you’re not familiar with a NPS score, it’s used to measure sentiment on a scale from -100 to +100. When you get asked “would you recommend” something on a 1-10 scale, generally they’re taking that number and bucketing it into 1-6 being detractors (counted as negative), 7-8 being neutral, and 9-10 being promoters (counted as positive). Above 0 is “good”, above 50 is “excellent.” See more about NPS scores here.
Sorry about the quality of the pics, these are basically ones I snapped myself on my iPhone. But hopefully they show some of what happened at the event!
Attendee Feedback (62 NPS, 50 responses)
“Informative, laid back, friendly, humorous event. My favorite conference for a couple of years now.” 84% of attendees said they were likely to return.
The things people liked the most as measured by the freeform comments were the openspaces (9 comments), the speakers/talks, especially their diversity (8 votes), the culture/atmosphere of the event (5 votes), and the community and people (5 votes).
This makes me happy. DevOpsDays isn’t just “a conference,” it really focuses on building community – people meeting each other in a friendly and collaborative environment. The content is nice but it’s not the primary value of the event.
Concerns people had the most were “Nothing/great job” (10 votes), difficulty with travel and parking at the venue, including handicap access (6 votes), talks (6 votes), we want better lunches (4 votes).
Read on for more but we’re probably changing venues next year and will keep access in mind. Now on the lunches – we used to have fancy lunches and they were a significant time and effort sink, with long lines, lots of time spent, and so on. We moved to box lunches and now lunch goes fast and easy and leaves everyone more time to interact with each other. We do not plan to ever change back from that, but we will see if we can get a BBQ place or something to do a nice lunch box.
(There were more likes and dislikes and we are evaluating action on all of them, but dang this post is going to be long already so I’m focusing on the top line items.)
Speaker Feedback (90 NPS, 10 responses)
Likes: No tech problems/helpful techs/setup organized (x4), Supportive/welcoming (x3), Engaged audience (x3). Dislikes: Chromebook support problem, schedule slippage, openspaces competing with Conversations talks.
Great overall, some things for us to tweak! After several years in the same venue and buying a lot of gear, our crack AV team have the tech end of it pretty much down pat.
Organizer Feedback (88 NPS, 8 responses)
Major likes included working together (x3), inclusion (x2), and the opportunity to give back (x2). Dislikes included some stressing out and looking for problems, and speaker notification happening late. There was good discussion about explaining openspaces more especially for the newer folks.
It’s important to me that our organizers have a good time too – my assigned domain on the organizer team is “Organizers” – besides working the master budget and schedule for folks, I facilitate and try to ensure that this volunteer gig is not onerous, and I’m happy we seem to be there.
Volunteer Feedback (94 NPS, 17 responses)
We have a lot of volunteers from the community that come to slave away working the event for a free ticket and a couple meals, basically. It’s very important to all of us that they have a good experience – these are the future organizers, and community members going above and beyond to give back to the community. Boyd and Daria and the other organizers did a great job both organizing the work and making sure the volunteers had time to participate in the event and have a good experience – even given the storm-nightmare loadout at the end of the event. Thanks to all our great volunteers!
Sponsor Feedback (60 NPS, 10 responses)
So… Sponsors. For a number of years we kept expanding our sponsor offerings. Then we realized the event had become too much of a traditional conference and we were spending lots of space, time, and effort on sponsors, when to be honest we don’t really need all that much money to put on the event. Two years ago after a bunch of sponsor problems and everyone working themselves to the bone to provide professional conference services I did away with sponsor tables altogether. We let them back this year but really wanted to make the event not about that. We also warn the sponsors up front this isn’t a “churn the leads” event, we want sponsors who are going to send technical people to engage with the community.
Did it work out that way? Kinda. There’s too much expectation set up about what “conferences are like” and “DevOpsDays are like” and between the person purchasing the sponsorship and the people actually sent on site there’s a lot of room for expectations to drift.
I feel like there’s plenty of big conferences for that kind of sponsor engagement. DevOpsDayses didn’t used to be like that, but as time goes on and they all grow it’s tempting to “improve” by making it more sponsor focused. We love sponsors who engage with the community but we consciously balance their participation in the event.
Funny story… Like I said we only let sponsor tables back on a limited basis this year. But there was a run on them, and we sold out of the ones we needed to fund the event quickly and had a bunch of sponsors still wanting to participate, including ones who had participated for years. So we extended the sponsor room, just to let them participate, because we felt bad about excluding them. So we always sell out, so that’s probably a sign that we’re doing fine there.
And we got to sponsor a house for the homeless with the spare money, so that’s spiffy.
Recruiter Feedback (-50 NPS, 2 responses)
This is a new addition that didn’t work out so well. We had imagined a big recruiter speed dating thing. But few recruiters and attendees signed up for it so we pivoted into a recruiter fair. It was during happy hour, but half the attendees leave before that. We had them by the bar, but the DevOps Trivia during the happy hour was also a big draw.
While all the recruiters rated their experience “good” they had low traffic.
So, sorry that didn’t work out. But I stressed to the organizers that this wasn’t a failure – if we don’t try new things that don’t work out sometimes, we’re not trying hard enough.
We’re one of the great grand-daddy DevOps events. We have years of experience, ample funding, and a big community. Smaller DoDs, especially ones getting off the ground, often need to hew close to the “standard format” for a safe launch and to pay their bills. We can afford to experiment, so I strongly urge the team every year to try different things. It’s OK if we appeal to different sets of the community each year. It’s OK to not do something again (even if it went well) and it’s OK to try new things as stretch goals. I kinda like putting how we run our event where our DevOps mouth is, so to speak.
This lets us try things out first. We were the first DoD with a multi-content track. We created the new “Conversations” talk format this year. We keep innovating, and sometimes there’s just not a fit given the constraints of venue, time, people, and so on. So this one didn’t go off great, but to me that just means we’re legitimately experimenting hard enough.
Ernest’s Retrospective Thoughts
Overall it went great! Smooth, excellent execution by everyone involved. I feel like the Austin tech community is stronger for our event existing and that’s what I want out of it.
My main challenge personally this year was with the talks.
We really went into this year with an intent to curate the talks to a pretty specific practitioner format. DoD Austin has a bunch of years behind it so we don’t necessarily need the DevOps “talk circuit” talks to fill slots. We feel like we can be very specific about the experience we want to curate – no repeat talks from other events (go watch them on the Internet, everyone posts videos!), some preference to local speakers, encourage diversity both in speakers and in content… But we didn’t execute on that well. We started using Papercall this year and it makes it easy for people to mass submit to multiple events – a great feature but somewhat antithetical to our needs. We had 200 submissions for 20 slots and had a lot of weeding to do and had to turn away a lot of folks. And while we had good talks, they didn’t fit our proposed theme necessarily.
We also just selected talks late, to where it risked people whose talks were declined not being able to attend because we sold out our attendee cap.
The second challenge was with openspaces. In general the larger the event, the harder it is to make openspaces work. Once there’s more than 25 people in an openspace the format collapses and it’s just “2-3 people talking to each other and everyone else straining to hear,” basically a super crap panel talk. Putting them in the luxury boxes in the stadium worked really well there, because only so many people can fit into one, so it was a forcing function to keep them small enough to work. So they went well overall.
But some folks didn’t like them. Each year we get some feedback from folks more used to traditional content. “Maybe we should get the openspace topics submitted before the conference so they’re already on the schedule!” No offense, but over my dead body. That’s not what openspaces are about and openspaces are the heart of DevOpsDays. They are for what the actual attendees want to talk about right then; the entire point is that they’re not programmed content. Early DevOpsDays were a couple talks and then pretty much all openspaces. My general attitude is “if you don’t want to participate in openspaces, this is not the event for you.” We need to explain openspaces more ahead of time though, to seed ideas and get new people to understand the format. Our experiment with mini-talks and then linked openspaces worked out great, I went to two of them and got high value out of them.
A couple big changes are coming next year.
First of all, we’re probably changing venue. We’ve enjoyed the stadium a lot, and love the staff there, but we’ve probably done as much as we can with the event in that particular form factor.
We’re considering going entirely to the new 20 minute talk format. They were well received – if you really have more content than 20 minutes, a linked openspace is probably the best venue to explore it with highly engaged attendees! And it’ll prevent people just submitting their “same talk” as much. We can also get more speakers in!
Also, we know it’s a bummer that we’ve been capping attendance and sponsors and that people who want to attend get turned away. So far we’ve felt like we have had to, both because of venue capacity but also to keep openspaces good and keep the great atmosphere and community and opportunities for engagement that make our event distinct.
Now that we have enough experience, we think we might be able to go bigger and still keep the small group and one-on-one interaction. We’ve all been to a bunch of conferences and seen other things – 1-1 mentoring table signups, for example, and other formats that facilitate it. We’re also thinking about adding some “working groups” – opportunities to do something, produce position papers, whatnot, give the experts a really neat thing to do at the event.
And maybe even add on a third day, with all unstructured content. On a Saturday so people could bring their kids and stuff.
I wanted to just blaze big next year; the rest of the team loved the vision but reminded me how much burn-in there is on a new venue – getting A/V figured out, all the rough spots of a year one… So we may iterate into it, with getting a new venue and going slightly larger and trying out new engagement ideas next year, and then the year after saying “Big tent! All are welcome! Fly in for this one, no attendee or sponsor caps!” and making it a heroically sized event.
There’s no one right format for DevOpsDays – I encourage other organizers to keep experimenting as well. Your event doesn’t have to be the same year to year; you can target different goals and audiences and sizes and such each time.
If anyone read this far, feel free and comment with your thoughts below! (Obligatory disclaimer, don’t tell me “well this isn’t right for my DevOpsDays” – that’s fine, none of this is to declare the “right” way to do an event, it’s just what is working for us in our community with our particular goals.)
We held our eighth DevOpsDays Austin last month! DevOpsDays Austin 2019 was held at the UT Austin stadium for two days full of talks, openspaces, and so on. All the videos of the sessions are up on YouTube in the DevOps Austin channel that holds other years’ videos as well.
Here’s my top 10 countdown list of great things about this year’s DevOpsDays Austin!
10. We brought the sponsor room back, and added platinum suites in the stadium luxury boxes so sponsors that wanted to hold sessions could do so. There were very well attended sessions in these suites!
9. We had two content tracks and a new “Conversations” talk format – a short 20 minute talk followed by a linked openspace for interactive demos and discussions and command line stuff that doesn’t do well in a talk session. We only had space for a handful of them but they were very highly rated and we’re considering shifting significantly towards them next year.
8. We made the happy hour more modest and onsite, but with DevOps Trivia from Patrick Debois! We had a bunch of teams compete and it was a wild and woolly time. We even used Patrick’s zender.tv online trivia thing to let people outside the venue compete.
7. Our fine venue, food, and drink team and vendors… We ripped into some mini cupcakes at snack time!!!
6. The openspaces. I actually got to attend some this year instead of just running around working. And they were all brilliant.
5. Our organizers! We bestowed the title of MVP organizer on two organizers this year – Daria Ilic for her great job with communication and Dan Zentgraf for doing a yeoman job with the sponsors.
Special thanks to all the DevOpsDays Austin 2019 organizers: James Wickett (Speakers), Peco Karayanev (Speakers), Karthik Gaekwad (Swag), Daria Ilic (Marketing, Volunteers), Dan Zentgraf (Sponsors), Tom Hall (Sponsors), Boyd Hemphill (Volunteers), Scott Baldwin (Web site), Lee Thompson (AV), Carl Perry (AV), Ian Richardson (Attendees), Chris Casey (Signage and Slides), Richard Boyd (Venue, Food, Happy Hour), Asif Ahmad (Venue, Food, Happy Hour), Bailey Moore (Venue, Food, Happy Hour), and thanks to Laura from ConferenceOps for doing all our finances.
4. I let the other organizers talk me into buying the Jumbotron! I am naturally thrifty so had resisted given the significant price tag in previous years, but we had a glut of sponsors and everyone really wanted it so I finally gave in. Karthik even changed his Slack name to JUMBOTRON to petition for it. It remains so until this very day. You have to respect the dedication. So behold – the DevOpsDays Austin Jumbotron! (Yes, that’s real, not Photoshopped.)
3. Check out our cool organizer swag I got each organizer this year as a thank you gift – custom Vans with the DevOpsDays Austin mascot on them! (They’re only $80, if a little work intensive to design on their site, feel free and steal the idea!) People always love our DevOpsDays Austin shirts so I wanted to give the organizers a really distinctive way to show their pride in the event.
2. A very special thank you to DevOpsDays Austin from Mandy Whaley and the Cisco DevNet crew, who have been sponsors and speakers and attendees for many years. I wasn’t expecting this – they actually used their sponsor shout-out time to present us onstage with a heartfelt card that they read to the audience.
We appreciate everything that Mandy and the team bring to the event and the card was super touching.
1. What could be better than that, though, you ask? How can such a kind shout-out be number 2 on the list?
Well, we had a little problem, and that problem was a spare $25,000 from letting in the gold sponsors above our initial sponsor room cap because they really, really wanted in and we felt bad for them. DevOpsDays Austin (like all DoDs) is a non-profit, so while we keep a war chest to pay for next year’s venue and stuff, the rest has to go. Previous years we did some modest donations to the Capitol Area Food Bank; last year we actually had enough spare money so that we let each organizer do a $1000 donation to a charity of their choice. But this was quite a larger chunk, so what to do?
Some of the organizers brought up a great opportunity they knew about and had given to themselves. Here in Austin there’s a really unique program going on, the Community First! Village – a planned community that provides affordable, permanent housing and a supportive community for men and women coming out of chronic homelessness.
And it turns out $25,000 is how much is needed to build a micro-home in their next phase of expansion, to house a formerly homeless person in their community. These are little 180-200 square foot homes with electricity but no plumbing that are the foundation of their village. The whole organizer team got super excited about this opportunity.
So that’s what we did – we sponsored one of these homes to be built. We’re pleased to have the ability to help Austin in a permanent way out of the conference!
I’m going to do a separate blog post on this because it’s an awesome program that many companies in Austin have been getting behind, and it’s remarkably successful in helping our large homeless population. But thanks so much to all the sponsors and attendees that made this possible.
We had a great time at DevOpsDays Austin this year and hope many of you did too. Next, we’ll publish a full retrospective that we hope some of you and other DevOpsDays organizers will find interesting.
Well, we were “unplugged,” but we managed to smuggle videos out anyway for your pleasure… Watch ’em, like ’em, comment to the speakers that you appreciate them giving to the global tech community! Especially since this year they weren’t pre-selected, voting on talks was done at the event, so these folks prepared a talk but weren’t for sure to give it, which takes guts!
This Thursday, both myself and my boss (the SVP of Engineering at Alienvault) went to Keep Austin Agile, the annual conference that Agile Austin, the local Austin agile user group network, puts on! I used to run the Agile Austin DevOps SIG till I just ran out of time to do all the community stuff I was doing and had to cut it out.
It’s super professional for a practitioner conference, and was at the JW Marriott in downtown Austin one day only. It was sold out at 750 people. I figured I’d share my notes in case anyone’s interested. All the presentations are online here and video is coming soon.
My first session was DevOps Archaeology by Lee Fox (@foxinatx), the cloud architect for Infor. The premise is that it’s an unfortunately common task in the industry to have to “go find out how that old thing works,” whether it’s code or systems or, of course, the hybrid of the two. So he has tips and tools to help with that process. Super practical. Several of my engineers at work are working on projects that are exactly this. “Hey that critical old system someone pooped out 3 years ago and then moved on – go figure it out and operationalize it.”
And, some discussion of testing, config management, and so on. Great talk, I will look into some of these tools!
This talk, by Allison Pollard (@allison_pollard) and Barry Forrest (@bforrest30), wasn’t really my cup of tea. It did a basic 4-quadrant personality survey to break us up into 4 categories of Compliance, Dominance, Steadiness, or Influencer. Then we spent most of the time wandering the room in a giant circle doing activities that each took 10 minutes longer than they needed to.
So I’m fine with the 4 quadrant thing – but I got taught a similar thing back when starting my first job at FedEx back in 1993, so it wasn’t exactly late breaking news. (Driver, Analytical, Amiable, and Expressive were the four, IIRC.) As a new person it was illuminating and made me realize you have to think about different personalities’ approaches and not consider other approaches automatically “bad.” So yay for the concept.
But I’m not big on the time consuming agile game thing that is at lots of these conferences. “What might turn you off about a Dominant person? That they can be rude?” Ok, good mini-wisdom, should it take 10 minutes to get it? Maybe it’s just because I’m a Driver, but I get extremely restless in formats like this. A lot of people must like them because agile conferences have them a lot, but they’re not for me.
First, he quoted Deming’s 14 points for total quality management. For the record (quoted from asq.org:
His talk focused on #7 and #8 – instituting leadership and driving out fear.
Many organizations are fear driven. Even if it’s more subtle than the fear of being fired, the fear of being proven wrong, losing face, etc. is a very real inhibitor. Moving the organization from fear to safety to awesome is the desired trajectory.
He uses “Modern Agile” (Modernagile.org) which I hadn’t heard of before, but its principles are aligned with this:
So how do we create safety? There’s a lot to that, but he presented a quality tool to analyze fear and its sources – who cares and why – to help.
Then the next step is to determine mitigations, and how to measure their success and timebox them. I’m a big fan of timeboxing, it is critical to making deeper improvement without being stuck down the rabbit hole. I tell my engineers all the time when asked “well but how much do I go improve this code/process” to pick a reasonable time box and then do what you can in that window.
OK, but once you have safety, how do you make people awesome? Well, what is awesome about a job? Focus on those things. You can use the usual Lean techniques, like stop-work authority, making progress visible (e.g. days without an incident), using the Toyota kata for continuous improvement, using Plan-Do-Check-Act…
In terms of tangible places to start, he focused on things that disrupt people’s sleep at night, doing retros for fear/safety, and establishing metric indicators as targets for improvement.
Andy McKnight gave this interesting talk – explaining how the Marines build a culture and teamwork, so that we might adapt their approach to our organizations. I do like yelling at people, so I am all in!
Marine boot camp is partially about technical excellence, but also about steeping recruits in their organizational culture. (In business, new hire orientations have been shown to give strong benefits… And mentoring after the fact.)
What is culture? It is the shared values, beliefs, assumptions that govern how people behave.
Most organizations have microcultures at the team level. But how do you make a macroculture? Culture comes first, teambuilding second.
The 11 Marine Corps Leadership Principles:
On the scrum team – those necessary to get the work done
The two Leadership Objectives – mission accomplishment and team welfare, a balance.
Discussion of Commanders Intent and delegating decisions down to the lowest effective level.
Good discussion, loads of takeaways. At my work I would say we are working on developing a macroculture but don’t currently have one, so I’ll be interested to put some of this into practice.
All right! 4 of 5 sessions made me happy, which is a good ratio. Check out these talks and more on the Keep Austin Agile 2018 Web site! It’s a large and well run conference; consider attending it even if you’re not an “agile coach”!
Hey all! We’re starting work on next year’s DevOpsDays Austin – our seventh here in the ATX. Many of you have come out to the event (or another of the great DevOpsDays around the world). Well, we have some changes in store this year!
Last year’s DevOpsDays Austin, “Monsters of DevOps” was bigger than ever and had a stadium rock theme – we had a huge venue, all the DevOps VIPs we could pull down (including the first time all 4 authors of the DevOps Handbook managed to get together at an event), multiple content tracks, killer swag, great food, a hackathon, the best Happy Hour I’ve attended at a conference, we invited in and comped local user groups to give talks… Part of our continuing trajectory to make DoDA more all encompassing and awesome.
But – every year we sit down and discuss vision before we launch into the conference. What do we want to accomplish and why? Who are we serving and why? Why are we, personally, putting in huge amounts of unpaid work to serve the community? “Because it’s there and we did it last year” isn’t a good answer, so we like to really put some thought into it.
This time when we talked about it, first in our core group and then with the rest of the 2017 organizers, we realized that we’ve been concentrating on “bigger” but we’ve been putting more and more money and effort into the parts of the event that aren’t really of high DevOps value. Here in Texas, it’s easy to conflate bigger with better, since we’re both the biggest and the best! But we’re not sure that’s right. Many of the more expert people we know here in Austin don’t really come out to the event any more, unless they are giving a talk or recruiting for their current gig. Talks and openspaces have kept focused on introducing new people to DevOps, enterprise folks, “horses and donkeys,” and so on.
And as we talked, we said “Well – what do we personally get out of the conference nowadays as attendees?” The answer was “not much.” Openspaces are huge and end up being a couple people talking. Talks are either pretty familiar from the conference circuit or also designed for new folks. We have more content but it’s more passive content, sit and watch. It’s good for the newbies but not as much for the experienced folks.
We contrasted this to the first couple DevOpsDays we went to in Silicon Valley. The first couple were just in a big auditorium at LinkedIn. There weren’t any sponsor booths. More of the event was focused on the openspaces and interaction between the highly driven participants. We ate box lunches wherever we could perch in the parking lot outside – and swag was just a t-shirt. Heck, the third one was in a weird abandoned building Dave Nielsen had access to, we had to carry our own chairs around to talks and the food and stuff was in a concrete-and-cage loading dock. But it’s those events we got the most out of.
Therefore, this year DevOpsDays Austin is going to go to what we call a “Summit” format. We’re reducing the size of the event, and focusing more on local, motivated practitioners. What does this mean?
That was everyone’s initial reaction to this plan. But that’s silly – it has worked. We’re just doing things that DevOpsDays has already done, that ProductCamp has already done, and so on. It’s just not what’s become customary. After the organizers had a little time for it to sink in, they all rallied behind it with a vengeance.
We’ve run the numbers and just the basic $200/head attendee fees can pay for the venue, basic food, and a shirt, even if we get zero sponsors. (We won’t have zero sponsors, we just put our sponsor page up and someone bought in the first hour it was live.) As we get more funding we’ll pump up the event, but deliberately focus on the core experience of highly skilled techies learning from each other, instead of adding distractions.
This is the format we’d like to try this year. Other events will use other formats and that’s fine. Here at DoDA we try something different every year! We were the first to have multiple content tracks (over the complaints of some purists). We added a hackathon, we added a local user group track… Last year we went big with a vengeance, and it was cool. Now we’re going to do more small and exclusive, and that’ll be cool. Next year, it’ll be different. Whatever your event is doing, more power to you, don’t confuse us having a vision we believe in with us thinking you’re “wrong.”
We’d love to see everyone out at DevOpsDays Austin 2018! Come ready to interact and share. Come ready to give a talk, with the risk it won’t make. Come sponsor your company, just you won’t have a table to lounge at. This change has gotten us excited about running our seventh DevOpsDays, and we bet you’ll love it!